Office No. 8, Floor M, Century Tower, Kalma Chowk, Gulberg III, Lahore
+92 300 0839839  ·  info@imaarinternational.com
IMAAR Associates — Tax, Corporate & Legal Consultants, Lahore
IMAAR Associates
Tax · Corporate · Legal Consultants
Get Consultation
Important disclosure: IMAAR ASSOCIATES (PRIVATE) LIMITED is an independent private professional firm of licensed Income Tax Practitioners, Cost & Management Accountants and Advocates. We are not a government website and are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the FBR, SECP, PRA, PSEB or any government authority. We do not issue government documents and we do not approve applications — those decisions rest solely with the relevant authority. Taxpayers may deal with these authorities directly and free of charge at iris.fbr.gov.pk. Our fees are charged for professional advice, preparation and representation only and are published in full here.
HomeLegal ServicesTrademark LawyerObjection Reply

Trademark Objection Reply in Pakistan — Save Your Application

Most Pakistani trademark applications hit an examination objection — either descriptiveness/non-distinctiveness or similarity to an earlier mark — and most that die, die here, because no proper reply was filed in time. A reasoned reply (and, where fixed, a show-cause hearing before the Registrar) is how applications survive. IMAAR drafts objection replies built on the actual citations: mark comparisons, goods distinctions, consent letters, specification amendments and evidence of use — under the Trade Marks Ordinance 2001.

The Two Objections — and How Each Is Beaten

ObjectionWhat it meansWinning strategies
Absolute (distinctiveness)Mark seen as descriptive or non-distinctive for the goodsSuggestive-not-descriptive argument; stylization/composite elements; acquired distinctiveness through evidence of use (sales, advertising, duration)
Relative (similarity)Cited earlier mark(s) considered identical/confusingly similarVisual/phonetic/conceptual distinctions; different goods and trade channels; cited mark expired or abandoned; consent/coexistence letters; specification amendment; honest concurrent use
Governing Law

Trade Marks Ordinance 2001 — absolute grounds (s.14), relative grounds (s.17), examination and acceptance; Trade Marks Rules 2004 — reply timelines, hearings and extensions; onward remedies against refusal, including appeal.

Our Reply Process

  1. Same-day report read. Send the examination report; we identify each ground, cited marks and the operative deadline immediately.
  2. Citation analysis. Every cited mark checked — status, goods, real marketplace context. Dead citations sink many objections by themselves.
  3. Strategy selection. Argument, consent, amendment, evidence — the combination the citations actually call for, not a template.
  4. Evidence of use. Where distinctiveness or concurrent use is in play: affidavit with sales, advertising and duration exhibits, prepared to hearing standard.
  5. Reply — and hearing. Filed in time; if a show-cause hearing is fixed, we appear and argue. Refusals carry appeal remedies we pursue where the mark justifies it.

New filing instead? See trademark registration — a proper pre-filing search avoids most objections in the first place.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did my application get objected?
Almost always: descriptiveness/non-distinctiveness, or similarity to a cited earlier mark. The report states the grounds — send it for a same-day read.
What if I don't reply in time?
Abandonment/refusal for non-prosecution — where most lost Pakistani trademarks actually die. Watch the deadline from the day the report issues.
How are similarity objections overcome?
Mark and goods distinctions, dead/unrelated citations, consent letters, specification amendments, honest concurrent use — combined per the actual citations.
And descriptiveness objections?
Inherent distinctiveness arguments plus acquired distinctiveness through evidence of use — affidavits with sales and advertising exhibits carry these.
What if the reply fails?
Show-cause hearing before the Registrar — where many paper refusals are reversed — then appeal remedies where the mark justifies it.

Objection Deadlines Kill More Marks Than Examiners Do

Send your examination report now — grounds, deadline and strategy confirmed the same day, fixed fee quoted.

Speak Directly to Our Advocate

ہمارے وکیل سے براہِ راست بات کریں

Abdur Rehman Sandhu, Advocate

Content reviewed by Abdur Rehman Sandhu, Attorney of the High Court. Last reviewed: July 2026. General information, not legal advice.

💬